I ran my portfolio through the filter (got BORDERLINE)

Sigit's portfolio got SHORTLIST. Mine got BORDERLINE.

Same seniority. Same hiring filter. Different outcomes.

I ran two portfolios through the GPT I built yesterday.

One was my friend Sigit's. Previously at Expedia, Shopify, Tripadvisor.

The other was mine.

Same evaluation system. Different signals.

Sigit's portfolio (SHORTLIST):

My portfolio (BORDERLINE):

Same seniority level. Different verdicts.

The difference wasn't craft.

It was signal clarity.

This is what happens in the first 60 seconds of portfolio screening.

Hiring managers don't grade. They filter.

Six lenses:

1. Role & Level Fit Can I place this person in 60 seconds?

2. Relevance Does their work map to our problems?

3. Impact & Outcomes Did anything actually change because of them?

4. Judgment, Ownership & Slope Can I trust them with harder problems later?

5. Narrative Control & Influence Can they communicate outside design?

6. Hiring Risk & Ramp Speed How fast can they contribute without slowing us down?

Pass all six → SHORTLIST

Mixed signals → BORDERLINE

Ambiguity too high → SKIP

I built a GPT that replicates this exact process.

Same 6 lenses. Same 60-second evaluation. Same verdict system.

You'll see both portfolios evaluated live.

Want to see what your portfolio triggers?

Run it through the Fit Check: https://sendfox.com/lp/m52q0x

Copy your homepage text + first case study. Or upload your PDF.

You'll get:

Takes 60 seconds.

Not what your portfolio could be. What it is right now.

Joseph

P.S. If your verdict surprises you, that gap matters. That's what hiring managers feel in the first minute.

0 comments